House will move to transmit impeachment articles next week ! Nancy Pelosi

The president of the House of Representatives, Nancy Pelosi, announced on Friday that next week she will take steps to send political judgment articles to the Senate, after delaying the trial since last month in an attempt to extract favorable terms for a trial.

“I asked the chairman of the judicial committee, Jerry Nadler, to be ready to present a resolution next week to appoint the leaders and pass political judgment articles to the Senate. I will consult you at our Democratic Caucus meeting Tuesday in the House on how to go further, ”Pelosi, D-California, wrote in a letter to his colleagues.

The decision to publish the articles came when the Democratic comrades in recent days began to express their frustration and impatience with the speaker’s approach. They stressed the urgency with which the political process was addressed in late 2019 and wondered why the House would delay a trial using the articles as leverage.

When asked about Pelosi’s decision to move forward Friday, Senate majority leader Mitch McConnell, Kentucky Republican, said: “It was time.”

However, Pelosi defended his attention on the memo, highlighting important new information on the Ukrainian controversy at the center of the accusation raised in the meantime.

When asked about Pelosi’s decision to move forward Friday, Senate majority leader Mitch McConnell, Kentucky Republican, said: “It was time.”

However, Pelosi defended his attention on the memo, highlighting important new information on the Ukrainian controversy at the center of the accusation raised in the meantime.

“I am very proud of the courage and patriotism exhibited by our Democratic Chamber Caucus while supporting and defending the Constitution,” he wrote. He continued to exert pressure on the Senate, as he has for weeks, to conduct a “fair trial” with witnesses and documents.

Watch the latest video at

“In a political trial, each senator takes an oath to” do impartial justice in accordance with the Constitution and laws. “Every senator now faces an election: to be loyal to the President or the Constitution,” he wrote. “Nobody is above the law, not even the president.”

Pelosi’s lawsuits in recent days have included a request to McConnell to disclose the resolution that would set the terms of the trial before she sent the articles.

Apparently, Pelosi and his allies wanted to commit to calling some witnesses desired by the Democrats and at least getting to know McConnell’s plans better. But McConnell did not move, insisting that the Senate first initiated the trial and then resolved the problems surrounding witnesses later, stating that he would not bargain with Pelosi and accusing her of playing “irresponsible games” on Thursday.

While Senate minority leader Chuck Schumer, a New York Democrat, had widely supported Pelosi by asking for commitments from McConnell, other Democratic senators started putting pressure on the House this week to move.

“I think it’s time to deliver the articles,” said Senator Joe Manchin, D-W.Va., In Fox News’s “United States Newsroom”. “Let’s see where the Senate can take it.”

Senator Dianne Feinstein, a California Democrat, also called Pelosi for the delay.

“The harder, the less urgent it becomes,” Feinstein told the politician. “So if it’s serious and urgent, send them. If not, don’t send it.”

Sens. Angus King, D-Maine; Richard Blumenthal, D-Conn .; and Chris Coons, D-Del., also came out this week asking for the trial to proceed.

“I respect the fact that he is concerned about whether or not there will be a fair trial,” Coons told Politician this week. “But I think it’s time to move on.”

McConnell has repeatedly said that the resolution to govern the political process in the Senate would mirror that used for the political process of then President Bill Clinton in 1999, setting a timetable for the start of the process, with the opportunity for lawmakers to determine how proceed. Possible additional testimony and documents later, after both the defense and the prosecution issued their opening statements.

However, Senator Susan Collins, a Republican from Maine, expressed hope on Friday that Republicans will hold a trial that will present witnesses in the event that prosecutors and the president’s lawyer request it.

“I have had many discussions with some of my Republican colleagues on how we can adhere to President Clinton’s political process as practically as possible, which included in a third phase the decision to call witnesses,” Collins said on Friday. “I hope we can reach an agreement on how to proceed with the process that will allow witnesses both the House executives and the President’s attorney the opportunity if they decide to do so.”

He added: “It is important that both sides are treated fairly.”

McConnell said earlier this week that he had the necessary votes to pass the resolution and begin the process once the articles were received. In political judgment, most resolutions can be passed by simple majority: 51 votes. To remove the president from office, however, there must be 67 votes.

After Pelosi’s announcement on Friday, Senator Chuck Grassley, a Republican from Iowa, criticized the speaker for being late.

“President Pelosi threw the United States Congress into unnecessary chaos with this unnecessary delay,” Grassley said in a statement. “From the outset, it was not clear what the purpose of this tactic was to hurry and wait or what the country could win.” Now we know that the answer was nothing. “

“We had three weeks of uncertainty and confusion, causing even more division.” “Anyway, I’ll take my jury document seriously and review the evidence presented by both sides before making any decisions.”

Meanwhile, Pelosi’s next step will be to determine who will serve as House officials to prosecute the case against the President in the Senate trial.

Last month, bipartisan sources told Fox News that several names have been presented to defend the president’s impeachment.

Probable candidates include Nadler, D-N.Y., Whose panel drafted political judgment articles (abuse of power and obstruction of Congress); The president of the House of Representatives intelligence committee, Adam Schiff, a Democrat for California, who conducted much of the investigation into political trials outside his committee with dramatic hearings to develop the case against the president; President of the Democratic Chamber Caucus Hakeem Jeffries, D-N.Y.; and representative Jamie Raskin, D-Md., constitutional lawyer.

Other possible candidates include Democrats who were more outspoken during the political process hearings, such as Representative David Cicilline, D-R.I., Ed Eric Swalwell, D-Calif.

Sources told Fox News that other names included are representatives of Pramila Jayapal, D-Wash; Val Demings, D-Fla., Who was the first police chief in Orlando; and Zoe Lofgren, a California Democrat, involved in the political process of former President Bill Clinton and staff member during Congress’s investigation into former President Richard Nixon.

During Clinton’s impeachment in 1999, there were 13 layoff managers. A source familiar with the planning told Fox News that Pelosi should designate less of this.

This News is Reported By

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *